Showing posts with label CoVID-19. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CoVID-19. Show all posts

Sunday, December 6, 2020

A Cult of Denial

 

Beyond COVID-19 (as if that weren’t bad enough!), we’re enduring a pandemic of denial. I have no corroborating data, and my sources are limited to social media, personal conversations, online or radio/TV sources, and the op-ed pages of a few printed sources. Nevertheless, within that limited scope, the denial pandemic is contained almost exclusively to the right of socio/political/economic center, and the farther right one goes, the more widespread is the pandemic.

Within my limited field of observation, the infecting virus seems to be “thuh guv-uh-mint.” If any manifestation of government is related in any way to any issue, there will be opposition and denial from the right of center. It makes no difference whether the issue is beneficial or destructive. If government is involved, it will be rejected.

I seriously wonder, had the government issued a prohibition against wearing masks, would we have seen . . . Oh, never mind.

An article in a recent edition of the Washington Post began,

Americans heard the pleas to stay home. They were told what would happen if they didn’t. Still, millions traveled and gathered during the Thanksgiving holiday, either doubting the warnings or deciding they would take their chances. Now, like any partygoer waking from a raucous weekend — feeling a bit hung over and perhaps a tinge of regret — the nation is about to face the consequences of its behavior and will need to quickly apply the lessons before heading into the doubleheader of Christmas and New Year’s.”[1]

Denial. It’s too early to determine the article’s accuracy; however, evidence from the overwhelming majority of leading medical scientists has been confirmed many times over since the pandemic began. Still, the cult of denial asserts its doctrine of liberal conspiracies, saying “leftists” are using the pandemic to seize power and to pad the pockets of the pharmaceutical industry.

Denial. Then there’s right-wing denial of the recent election’s validity. A question occurs to me: If the Democrats were going to “rig” the election, don’t you think they’d want to rig the senatorial votes, too?

The Post article concludes:

“Public health messaging needs to be retooled, as whole swaths of the country are simply tuning out the warnings from officials and experts.

“We have to rethink how we’re communicating. Blaming people, yelling at them, stigmatizing them — clearly it’s not working,” said Angela Rasmussen, a virologist at Georgetown Center for Global Health Science and Security. “We have to show compassion and empathy. Understand where people are coming from and persuade them to do otherwise.”[2]

Improved communication always is a valid goal; moreover, I like the way the quoted virologist takes responsibility for trying to resolve the obvious impasse, rather than simply blaming the denying public. It's a good model for all of us! Still, if communication is to be dialogical, both sides must decide to listen—LISTEN—as well as to articulate their points. When minds are made up, …you know the rejoinder: “don’t confuse me with facts.”

And already, before a vaccine is ready to be dispensed, the deniers are up in arms. The anti-vaxxer cult published a recent meme on Facebook saying, “We have the flu vaccine; but we still have flu.” The implication is clear: it’s the antivaxxer theme song.

Yes, we still have flu. It’s a viral infection that needs annual vaccination because it mutates. The same likely will be true regarding the coronavirus. Moreover, only 40% of Americans utilize the influenza vaccine on a yearly basis,[3] thus diluting the vaccine’s overall effectiveness.

Furthermore, antivaxxer logic loses credibility totally when one considers vaccines for smallpox, diphtheria, polio, and other historic pandemics.

Moving on: consider the rampant denial of racism. Within my small circle of acquaintances, those who deny racism seem to take every comment about racism as a direct accusation that they, personally, are racist.

Hand-in-hand with the denial of racism is the denial of “white privilege.” White privilege does not imply that whites don’t encounter difficulties; but white people’s difficulties do not result directly from their skin color. It simply is not enough to be non-racist. We need to move toward a cultural climate of anti-racism.

The cult of denial is just one of many clearly identifiable characteristics of the deeply entrenched tribalism that divides our nation into antagonistic factions. The hostilities are accelerating, and I fear armed confrontation is inevitable unless the trend can be reversed.

The reversal of national antagonism depends upon the willingness of all parties to accept their human limitations, including the possibility that their ideologies are not infallible. At best, human ideologies represent partial truth. I repeat here my belief in absolute truth, although I believe it is humanly impossible to comprehend truth absolutely. Truth always is strained through the filters of human perception and circumstance. I refer to St. Paul: “…For now we see in a mirror, dimly…” (I Corinthians 13:12 NRSV)At best, our comprehension of truth is incomplete.

Every position along the left/right socio/political spectrum represents a relative imbalance vis-à-vis the greatest good to the greatest number of people, and about the needs of society versus the needs of the individual.

The Church is in the season of Advent, and I am struck by the parallels of human brokenness addressed by the Hebrew prophets eight centuries before Christ compared to the latest headline of any current newspaper. The words of the ancient trumpets of God remain as valid today as they were 2,800 years ago. The cynical Preacher was right: What has been is what will be, and what has been done is what will be done; there is nothing new under the sun.” (Ecclesiastes 1:9 NRSV)

I see reality through the lens of a Christian pastor; nevertheless, virtually every major religious faith upholds similar ideals, and the truth, as I see it, is that human brokenness has not yet been surrendered to those universal truths that call us to peace and justice and love.

That’s the way I see it through the Flawed Glass that is my world view.

Together in the Walk,

Jim

Wednesday, August 26, 2020

COVID-19: Pespective

In response to those who would discount the seriousness of the COVID-19 pandemic, or who would reduce the human death toll to a statistic or a percentage of the population, and then dismiss them as insignificant, it may be noteworthy to compare coronavirus deaths with deaths from the worst pandemics/epidemics in the United States since the early 20th century:

Date

Pandemic

# Deaths

Length of Pandemic

1918

H1N1 Spanish Flue

675000

One Year

1921-25

Diphtheria

14000

Average annual deaths over 5 years

1916-55

Polio

1225

Average annual deaths over 40 years

1957

H2N2  Bird Flu

116000

One Year

2009

H1N1 Swine Flu

12469

One Year

1985-2013

HIV/AIDS*

24000

Average annual deaths over 28 years

2020

COVID-19** (Mar-Aug)

182818

six months

 I have no criteria by which to qualify the advance of medical science in the 102 years between 1918 and 2020; nevertheless, whatever evaluative criteria one may find, medical science today has advanced beyond that of any of the previous pandemic or epidemic eras. Yet, even with that advantage, aside from The Spanish Flu in 1918, The COVID-19 pandemic has claimed—in six months—more American lives than the total annual deaths (averaging the annual deaths from pandemics that lasted more than one year) from all the previous epidemics and pandemics combined!

Perspective.

I also am aware that America’s population today is larger than previous eras considered. Still, I am at a total loss to understand the blasé, casual approach of so many conservative Americans to a pandemic whose death toll in six months significantly outstrips the total combined annual deaths of previous major pandemics over the past 100 years! How is that insignificant?

While the research is yet too young to be conclusive, the evidence of long-term impact of the coronavirus increases with every study: heart and lung damage, neurological symptoms, and serious questions about immunity for those who survive. And the virus appears already to have gone through one or more mutations, making it even more difficult to pin down and treat. How is that insignificant?

The most difficult aspect for me to understand is how so many Americans dismiss out of had the recommendations of the leading medical authorities on the planet! [I know: liberal conspiracy. Right?]

Natural medicine has its value. I practice it, but not exclusively. It’s been my observation that not much of life comes to us in singular, neatly wrapped packages; nor does much of life present itself in a binary, right/wrong, black/white, good/evil format. Almost all of life is lived in relation to a balance of factors lived out on an ideological continuum. Life is comprised of the decisions each person makes in relation to the challenges and opportunities presented by that continuum. For the Christian, those decisions are informed by the way a person understands and follows Jesus of Nazareth.

To a significant degree, human problems begin when fallible persons or groups settle at one position along life’s spectrum and declare that position to be absolute and infallible.

“A 5% death rate is acceptable.” REALLY!?!?! There’s absolutely no way of discerning how many of those deaths could have been prevented had Bubba not been so pig-headed about wearing a mask and keeping his distance and avoiding social gatherings. Preventable deaths are not acceptable!

“But my rights…!!!” Baloney! Your rights stop where my nose begins; and you do not have the right to gamble with my health or my family’s health—or maybe even our lives, just to make your statement. And, of course, Bubba seems incapable of considering the possibility that he may be wrong. [see comments above about making one’s position on life’s continuum absolute and infallible.]

Neither 882,818 deaths, nor any percent thereof, can be dismissed flippantly —especially by any who claim to be a follower of Jesus Christ, and especially when the overwhelming majority of respected medical science has indicated that some of those deaths could have been avoided by compliance to some simple precautions (acknowledging that the precautions can be somewhat incongruent with our comfort zones.)

How many rallies, sporting events, church re-openings, face-to-face on-site school re-openings (including major universities), parties, and concerts have been followed by spikes in the incidence of infection? How is that insignificant?

From Bubba to the White House, a major subset of the American population has never taken the pandemic seriously, and continues to refuse to follow the simple guidelines established by medical science, in effect dismissing medical science’s virtual elimination of smallpox, polio, and other pandemics as a liberal conspiracy.

And as a result, America once again is #1! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA!

That’s the way it looks through the flawed glass that is my world view.

Together in the Walk,

Jim

____________________

*The HIV/AIDS pandemic involved primarily a specific sub-culture, as compared to the general population included in the other pandemic deaths in this study.

**I found four different figures, with a variance of almost 3,500 deaths from the lowest to the highest. The difference in each case was the starting date, which varied from January 1 to January 21 of this year.


Sunday, July 5, 2020

High Stakes Gambling

In America one has a right to believe, and to proclaim, and to live by the belief that Dr. Anthony Fauci, Johns Hopkins Medical Center, Mayo Clinic, The American Medical Association, the Center for Disease Control, and the World Health Organization (and others) are engaged in a national, or maybe even a global liberal conspiracy to control the world. One has a right, in America, to believe that the COVID-19 pandemic is a ruse—a tool being used by said liberal conspiracy to take away our freedoms and liberties and rights, and that it is no more threatening than last year’s influenza season.

One has that right.

But, what if there is a slight chance—an ever-so-slight chance—even just a 10% chance—that one would be wrong in that belief? What if the coronavirus is as deadly as the evil, liberal conspiracy claims?

What if wearing a mask and social distancing really do reduce the risk [nobody ever claimed those actions would totally eliminate the risk] of contracting—or of transmitting—the disease? It’s one thing to say, “I’ll take my chances.” “I’m willing to gamble with my health, and maybe my life, on the belief that I’m right.”

One has that right.

Until…

…until that right violates my right(s). As the cliché goes, “Your rights stop where my nose begins.”

At some point it ceases to be a matter of one’s personal liberties and rights, and becomes a matter of cooperation, compassion, and common decency and respect.

So, while one can say, “I’ll take my chances; I’m willing to gamble with my health, and even my life, on my belief,” it’s NOT OK to gamble with my health and my family’s health on the basis of your obstinacy. And it’s not OK to dismiss my concerns as the incoherent mutterings of a university-brainwashed libtard.

What if you’re wrong? The stakes are terribly high.

That’s the way it looks through the Flawed Glass that is my world view.

Together in the Walk,

Jim


Tuesday, May 12, 2020

Crybaby


Maybe it’s my reaction to being self-quarantined, but I’ve gone beyond anger to grief. I’ve stopped responding to most Facebook posts (who knows how long that will last?), and often find myself weeping at what I’m reading. I guess I’m a crybaby.

Beyond my relatively narrow sampling on Facebook, the news on all media (and I do watch all media) extends my impression that our American culture is growing more and more angry and hostile—more filled with hatred and rage—by the day.

There has long been a tendency among some Americans to prioritize political ideology over human need and to focus on the miniscule percentage of fraud to justify not working toward meeting the multitude of need. Today on Facebook there was a photo of a couple carrying a banner that read, “I won’t sacrifice my rights for your safety.” What a rotten attitude! And there was that 2017 quote from a voter who said, “I trust Trump more than Jesus.” And it’s well established by now that at least part of one political party has declared publicly that the economy is more important than human life. Pro-life? Indeed.

Last week someone posted, “I’ll take my chances.” That’s fine if your chances are all that’s at stake. When you take your chances you also are gambling with someone else’s chances—including mine and my family’s; so, I tend to take it personally.

How is love demonstrated in any of the above? Or has the message of Jesus also become a hoax in this “Christian” nation? A conspiracy inflicted upon us by “liberal theology?”

And I grieve over the growing anti-empiricist mentality among a significant subset of a whole generation. Expertise of any kind is equated with idiocy and stupidity. Empirical evidence that can be seen and measured and graphed is denied as manufactured. It’s easier and more convenient to believe that the scientific and medical communities are lying—they’re involved in a conspiracy to take away our freedoms. One always can find somebody with a degree or a title to support one’s previous presuppositions; therefore, the information bubble is preferred over empirical evidence.

The upshot is that a large portion of the American public just refuses to believe that the CoVID-19 pandemic is real. It’s a hoax. It’s no more dangerous than the annual round of flu. I hope they’re right. I truly hope I’m wrong—that medical science is wrong. Maybe medical science was wrong about smallpox, too. And polio. And the Spanish flu in 1918. Maybe those killers would simply have run their course and life would have gone on, even without medical intervention. Maybe medical science didn’t shorten the duration of those pandemics. No big deal.

Maybe the bubonic plague would have simply run its course without a massive clean-up of heaps of rat-infested garbage in the streets. No big deal.

The really big deal that makes me weep is the number of deaths that could have been—that still could be—prevented. If the risk can be reduced by temporary inconvenience and discomfort, why would anyone refuse to accept those inconveniences? It’s not as if it’s forever.

What wrenches my gut is the haunting, tragic image of that photo I saw this morning—that banner that said, “I won’t sacrifice my freedom for your safety.” Is that really—REALLY—where we are? I wonder what would have happened if the government (whoever that is) had issued a proclamation demanding that everyone disregard the pandemic and carry on as usual. My suspicion is that those who flaunt their freedom today would have burrowed in while whining, “The government isn’t going to tell me what to do! I’m not going to risk my safety for your freedom!”

Maybe that’s really what it’s all about: “Nobody’s going to tell me what to do.”

When Jesus’ disciples were arguing over which of them would be the greatest, he got up and washed their feet. And then he said, I have set you an example, that you also should do as I have done to you.” John 13:15 (NRSV)


But, yeah, don’t sacrifice your freedom for anybody else’s safety.

That’s the way it looks through the Flawed Glass that is my world view.

Together in the Walk,
Jim